See the work before you book the interview.
Give candidates a short, role-specific assessment. Your team sees what they submitted, how it performed, and where to look closer before spending an interview slot.
MCQ · Coding · Text-based · File upload
Role-specific taskA resume says they can
Ask for a small piece of the actual work and see the response yourself.
Generic tests miss the role
Build the assessment around the job, not a one-size-fits-all quiz.
Manual grading slows the shortlist
Open organized scores, responses, and evidence instead of a marking queue.
One assessment. Four ways to show the work.
Switch between sample responses to see what the candidate completes and what your recruiter can inspect afterward.
Choose a format, then review the work
Question 2 of 4
Task
Prevent duplicate order updates when the same event is retried.
Candidate solution
const seen = new Set()
if (seen.has(event.id)) return
await updateOrder(event)
seen.add(event.id)
Recruiter result
3 of 4 test cases passed
Core logic
Passed
Retry boundary
Review
Readability
Strong
Question 2 of 4
Task
Prevent duplicate order updates when the same event is retried.
Candidate solution
01const seen = new Set()
02if (seen.has(event.id)) return
03await updateOrder(event)
04seen.add(event.id)
The score comes with the work attached
Switch formats to see how each response becomes a reviewable result. The original answer always stays beside the evaluation.
3 of 4 test cases passed
Response and evaluation ready for review
Evidence summary
Duplicate events are blocked after the first update, but a retry that arrives before the first write completes can still run twice.
Your team can shortlist, hold, or reject after reading the evidence.
Useful beyond technical hiring
Mix formats to reflect the work. A developer can write code, a support candidate can draft a reply, and an analyst can submit a workbook.
Engineering
Use coding tasks with test cases to see how a candidate solves the problem, not just whether they know the right term.
Support and sales
Review written replies for clarity, empathy, judgement, and the policies that matter in the role.
Operations and finance
Ask candidates to work in a document or spreadsheet and evaluate the deliverable against your rubric.
Role knowledge
Check essential knowledge with single- or multi-correct questions that match the job context.
The assessment stays relevant. The decision stays human.
Use AI to reduce setup and review work without hiding the candidate’s original response or turning a signal into a verdict.
Choose the job and the work to test
Pick one or more formats and a duration. Draft questions with AI from the job context or write your own, then edit and review before sending.
Let candidates show how they think
Candidates complete the assessment in one focused workspace. Responses, timing, and configured session activity are captured with the attempt.
Review the answer behind the score
Open the format breakdown, individual responses, test-case results, recording, and integrity activity. Then shortlist, hold, or reject yourself.
- Questions drafted from the role
- Scores and responses by format
- Recording and integrity activity when enabled
- The questions and coding test cases before launch
- The evidence behind a score
- Who should move to the next stage
Skills evidence before another interview
A resume can describe experience, but it cannot show how someone handles the work. AI Assessments lets you ask for a focused, job-relevant response before committing more recruiter and interviewer time.
Candidates can answer MCQs, solve coding problems, write a response, or upload a real deliverable. Your team reviews the score beside the original submission, the criteria used, and any configured session activity. IntervueBox organizes the evidence; your team decides what it means.
Four ways to show capability
Combine MCQ, coding, text-based, and file-upload tasks in the same assessment.
Questions shaped around the job
Use the attached job as context when drafting with AI, then edit and review every question before launch.
The original response stays visible
Inspect selected answers, code and test cases, written responses, or submitted files alongside the result.
A breakdown by assessment format
See the score and completion details for each type of work included in the assessment.
Integrity activity for review
When configured, review recordings, snapshots, tab switches, and other session activity as evidence rather than an automatic verdict.
Recruiters keep the final action
Shortlist, hold, or reject only after your team has reviewed the submission and its context.
What teams say
Sample quotes shown for layout review. Real customer stories will replace these.
Same test, graded the same way every time, with the failing line pointed out. Debriefs got a lot shorter.
We moved from take home guesswork to a scored breakdown per skill. The shortlist finally reflects who can do the work.
Proctoring as a signal, not a verdict, was the difference. My team reads the flag and decides.
Frequently asked questions
What kinds of tests can I run?
You can combine MCQs, coding problems, text-based questions, and file-upload tasks. That covers technical work as well as writing, support judgement, spreadsheet analysis, design or document deliverables, and role knowledge.
Can AI create the assessment for me?
AI can draft questions using your prompt and the attached job context. You can preview and edit the generated questions before adding them. Coding problems should be opened in the playground so your team can verify the test cases before launch.
What do recruiters see after completion?
The report shows an overall result, a breakdown for each format used, the candidate's individual responses, completion and timing details, and an AI summary when available. Coding responses include test-case results, while text and file tasks can be reviewed against the criteria you configured.
How is assessment integrity handled?
Depending on your configuration, the report can include the assessment recording, snapshots, tab-switch timestamps, and an integrity flag. These are review signals. Your team examines the activity in context and makes the final decision.
Can I use it for non-technical roles?
Yes. Text-based and file-upload tasks are useful for support, sales, operations, finance, marketing, and other roles where the best evidence is a written response or a real work sample rather than code.
How is it priced?
Assessments are metered per assessment, so usage follows the candidate volume you run. You can start with free credits and review real assessment reports before scaling the workflow.
Works with the rest of the platform
Ask for proof before another interview.
Build one focused assessment around the role, let candidates show the work, and review the evidence before deciding who moves.